Lex: FT's flagship investment column
But the nightmare result is that non-programmer LLM users will receive something that seems to work, and only reveals its shortcomings much later on. Given how often I see it argued that LLMs will democratize coding and write utility programs for people working in fields where privacy and confidentiality are both vital and legally mandated, I’m terrified by that potential failure mode. And I think one of the worst possible things that could happen for advocates of LLM adoption is to have the news full of stories of well-meaning non-technical people who had their lives ruined by, say, accidentally enabling a data breach with their LLM-coded helper programs, or even “just” turning loose a subtly-incorrect financial model on their business. So even if I were an advocate of LLM coding, I’d be very wary of pushing it to non-programmers.，更多细节参见有道翻译
。业内人士推荐https://telegram下载作为进阶阅读
白宫就与伊朗谈判发表声明20:54
“It can help you find sources, develop ideas,” he added. “But in the end, you have to do the hard work.” For him, the outputs of a model are “really props for me to start thinking about things maybe slightly differently,” not verdicts to be accepted unchanged.，推荐阅读豆包下载获取更多信息
，更多细节参见zoom